Case Study
MFI Real life context
The following is excerpted from real life context. MFI requested a presention of the RAFT process. Paul Brandt the Technical Director was
charged with testing the process with a live project to copy an existing top line door presentation - the Provencal Style Door (Fig. 1) requesting that RAFT is employed to replicate the door. The result as follows:
1. Visual Comparison
2. Summary - Comparables
Carbon Footprint
Cost Comparison
Excerpt from Email from Paul Brant, MFI Technical Director to John O`Connell Ex Deputy Chairman MFI following the above presentation
From: "BRANT, Paul"
Cc:; "ATKINSON, Stephen" ; "FENWICK, Rob" ; "DUNNE, Patrick" ; "ROSBY, Jon" ; "MORRIS, Wendy" ; "HANNY, Richard" ; "HENRIKSEN, Matthew"
Subject: Project RAFT
John
It was nice to see you again I hope you found the meeting as interesting as we did.
As promised, a summary of the meeting and action plan regarding the development opportunities of the RAFT technology within MFI.
I look forward to your reply
Kind Regards
Paul
1. Visual Comparison
|
|
|
| Fig. 1. MFI | Fig. 2. RAFT |
2. Summary - Comparables
| MFI | Manufacturing plant required for | 2,000 doors per day | 5,000 sq m. |
| RAFT | Manufacturing plant required for | 2,000 doors per day | 1,000 sq m. |
| MFI | 100% machined wood. | Wood waste per door | 30% |
| RAFT | 10% Machined recycled wood | Wood waste per door | 2% |
| MFI | 1st. Cost $15 | ||
| RAFT | 1st. Cost $3 |
Excerpt from Email from Paul Brant, MFI Technical Director to John O`Connell Ex Deputy Chairman MFI following the above presentation
From: "BRANT, Paul"
Cc:
Subject: Project RAFT
John
It was nice to see you again I hope you found the meeting as interesting as we did.
As promised, a summary of the meeting and action plan regarding the development opportunities of the RAFT technology within MFI.
I look forward to your reply
Kind Regards
Paul

